Calculations were made for five ten years periods in 2007-2056. However, each management schedule was continued to the final felling or at the maximum up to the 150 years. The results are reported only for the first 30 year period (2007-2036); the years beyond that era are for sustainability reasons.
In MELA2007 - program (MELA2007 Reference ... 2007) treewise basal-area growth models are calibrated using growth measurement data from 8th NFI. For calibration, growth measurements were adjusted with growth indices to the average level of diameter increment for years 1965-1994 (Henttonen 2000, Hynynen et al. 2002). For calculations presented here, tree basal-area growth models for forest land were calibrated using growth measurement data from 10th NFI. For calibration, growth measurements were adjusted with growth indices to the average level of diameter increment for years 1976-2007. (Korhonen et al. 2007). The calibration was done with sample trees from NFI measured in years 2004-2008. Sample trees in a sample plot were accepted to calibration data if the sample plot was at forest land, the whole sample plot was in a single stand and no cuttings were recorded for the 10 year period before the measurement year.
| Average basal area growth of sample trees | Show table |
A finite number of alternative management schedules were automatically simulated for NFI plots with MELA2007 (MELA2007 Reference ...2007). Simulations were based on tree level natural process models for ingrowth, growth and mortality (e.g. Hynynen et al., 2002) and feasible (sound and acceptable) stand level management actions. Possible management actions were thinnings based either on number of trees or on basal area, final fellings (clear cutting, seed tree cutting and shelterwood cutting), preparation of regeneration areas, natural and artificial regeneration, and tending of young stands. Management actions were simulated when the criterias of current Finnish silvicultural guidelines (Metsätalouden kehittämiskeskus Tapio, 2006; Keskimölö et al., 2008), the guidelines for peat lands (Ruotsalainen, 2007 were satisfied. For each management activity there was also always a no-treatment alternative. Management actions were simulated only on the forest land allowable for wood production and only roundwood cuttings were considered i.e.no energy wood harvesting alternatives. No management actions were allowed on protected forests and no cuttings were made on poorly productive forest land even if the wood production was allowed. Prescribed burning, drainage of new areas, fertilization or pruning were not included in the management alternatives.
Stumpage prices (€/m3) are based on the average realized stumpage prices 1998-2008 (Metinfo, accessed 15.5.2009) by timber assortments deflated to the year 2008 Roadside prices were induced by adding average realized harvesting costs (€/m3) on stumpage prices.
| Applied stumpage and road-side prices, €/m3. Birch pulpwood prices are used for saw logs and pulpwood of other broadleaved species. | Show table |
The applied unit prices (€/h) of roundwood logging. Prices include wages, social costs, compensations for tools, profits of entrepreneurship.
| Task | Unit price €/h |
| Forest haulage | 65,00 |
| Harvest | 90,00 |
| Manual logging | 26,85 |
Unit prices for silvicultural tasks are calculated as the averages of realized prices 1998-2007 (Metinfo, accessed 15.5.2009) by tasks deflated to the year 2008.
| Applied unit prices of silvicultural work | Show table |